Adaptive charge and chemistry
Chemistry targets held across scrap-charge variation, alloy changes and furnace state — with alloy additions and corrections proposed per heat, not per recipe book.
Feature by feature, the controls, sensors, models and guardrails that make a foundry run closed-loop — from the charge going into the furnace to the finished casting leaving the fettling cell.
Built with foundries and die casters melting iron, steel, aluminium, magnesium and copper
[PLACEHOLDER] Design-partner names are illustrative until first references are signed.
Melting is the plant's biggest energy line and its first quality gate. Meltra treats it as a control problem, not a recipe.
Chemistry targets held across scrap-charge variation, alloy changes and furnace state — with alloy additions and corrections proposed per heat, not per recipe book.
Superheat, holding and tap temperature controlled against the pour plan, so metal arrives at the mold at the temperature the twin assumed.
Degassing, inoculation and nodularization timing controlled and verified with thermal analysis, so fade never silently changes the metallurgy.
Furnace energy windows scheduled with cuOpt against tariff, melt readiness and mold readiness — melt loss and kWh per tonne both fall.
Coreon controls the sand system and the core cell so mold quality is a controlled variable instead of an inspection finding.
Compactability, moisture, green strength and return-sand condition tracked and corrected before a bad batch reaches the molding line.
Shot parameters, cure and core strength controlled per core box, with dimensional verification tied back to the part.
Every mold scored against the twin's expectation before metal is committed to it — no pouring good metal into a bad mold.
Dimensional faults linked to sand, core and mold conditions instead of being written off as line variation.
Pourbot controls ladle attitude, stream shape, pour temperature and fill time per geometry — the difference between a filled mold and a misrun or cold shut, executed the same way on every mold.
Poreon fuses X-ray, CT, vision and dimensional data into one verdict per casting — and one root cause for the agent upstream.
DICONDE image and volume inference on Jetson and IGX, with CT batch triage inside minutes per part family rather than a sampling plan.
Sand defects, cold shuts, misruns and surface faults detected at line rate across 8–24 camera or detector streams per line.
Dimensional scans and microstructure indicators graded against the part spec and the twin's as-cast prediction.
Every defect is attributed to melt, sand, gating, pour or cooling conditions and returned to the responsible agent as a training label.
The defect taxonomy the platform senses, predicts and attributes — the vocabulary a foundry actually argues in.
Entrapped or dissolved gas, predicted from melt hydrogen state, degassing history, pour turbulence and mold permeability.
Feeding failure during solidification, predicted from cooling curves, gating and riser performance in the twin.
Oxides, slag and dross, attributed to melt handling, ladle practice, stream turbulence and filtration.
Incomplete fusion of two metal fronts, driven by pour temperature, fill time and gating geometry.
Incomplete fill, driven by pour temperature, fluidity, fill rate and mold venting.
Tearing during solidification contraction, predicted from thermal gradients, mold restraint and geometry features.
Inclusions, scabs, erosion and penetration linked to sand properties, compaction and mold handling.
Deviation from print, linked to core position, mold conditions, shrinkage and shakeout timing.
Nodularity, graphite morphology and phase drift, tied to chemistry, inoculation fade and cooling rate.
Cut-off, grinding and deburring paths learned per geometry and executed hands-free, removing the hottest, dustiest, most injury-prone manual work in the plant.
Pouring robots, mold handling and casting handling commanded inside safety-rated envelopes with Isaac-based motion and full traceability.
Yield, melt loss, scrap and moving-line takt balanced across melt, mold and pour, with sub-60-second rescheduling when the line is disrupted.
Right-first-time, non-conformance and full casting genealogy maintained for IATF 16949, ISO 9001, AS9100 and NADCAP evidence.
The CLI and console speak in foundry terms — heats, molds, pours, windows, approvals — not in model names.
30–120
FPS vision inference per line
< 2 min
CT batch triage per part family
< 60s
Line reschedule after disruption
12–40
Models served per factory
[ASPIRATIONAL] Performance targets from Smelteon's GPU utilization plan.
That is the point. Predictions come from melt, sand, mold, pour and cooling signals, and Poreon's X-ray and CT verdicts are the labels that keep them honest. Inspection stays the ground truth; prediction is what lets you act before the value is added.
No. Melt chemistry, sand and mold control, solidification control and inspection all run on machines you already have. Robotic pouring and fettling are where robot integration matters, and those are separate wedges.
Castwin simulates the new geometry and alloy against the plant's own history, proposes gating and process windows, and the models start in shadow mode on that part until accuracy clears the golden-set gate.
Bring us the cell where scrap, rework, melt loss or inspection backlog costs the most. We will baseline it and show what the loop moves.